This episode of Sex Is Medicine clearly breaks down the overt and intentional lies told by Nicole Daedone regarding the origins of Orgasmic Meditation (OM). This episode highlights how these falsehoods were used to manipulate and coerce clients, employees, and the general public into practicing OM. The misleading narrative suggested that OM was a legitimate esoteric method of spiritual realization, supposedly transmitted by a Buddhist monk to OneTaste founder Nicole Daedone.
These lies form the foundation of the OneTaste brand and its primary methodology, Orgasmic Meditation. They directly challenge the core of the OneTaste trial defense, which claims that the plaintiff and OM participants were always in “full consent.”
However, one of the basic tenets of abuse recovery is recognizing that you cannot consent to a lie. Withholding or omitting the truth, as well as intentionally deceiving people about the origins of a method to manipulate their perception, are hallmarks of abusive behavior.
This is crucial because OM was, and still is, promoted as a method for “healing sexual trauma,” yet the very foundation of the practice was built on an extensive and deliberate lie propagated by Nicole Daedone through multiple media outlets. Fortunately, the US justice system agrees with this perspective.
On Monday, June 9th, 2025, after less than 2 days of deliberation, a federal jury convicted the Founder and former CEO of OneTaste, Nicole Daedone, and her former head of sales, Rachel Cherwitz, of forced labor conspiracy.
After hearing 5 weeks of testimony from former employees and clients of OneTaste, based on the evidence presented, it took less than 48 hours for the jury to determine that the defendants, Nicole Daedone and Rachel Cherwitz , subjected their victims to:
- economic
- sexual
- emotional
- financial
- and psychological abuse
- as well as surveillance
- indoctrination
- and intimidation
They are each facing up to 20 years in prison. Read more here.
The defense presented by Nicole Daedone and Rachel Cherwitz argued that all participants consented to the practices of OneTaste. Defense attorney Celia Cohen, representing Cherwitz, stated in her closing arguments, “Regardless of what you think about OneTaste and what they were doing, the participants chose it. They knew what it was about. The fact that they regret their actions from their younger years is not evidence of a crime.”
However, can one truly consent to something built on a lie? Are you truly exercising agency if the information guiding your choices is misleading or entirely false?
If the practices and their origins were based on deception, then full consent was never possible in the relational dynamics from the beginning. You cannot consent to a lie. Lying or misleading someone about the origins of a practice or method they are engaging in robs them of their ability to consent. And, misrepresenting the truth, lying, deception, and manipulation are all tools and indicators of psychological abuse.
Here are multiple, publicly documented lies about OM being a Buddhist Sex Technique:
2016 Excerpt from Complex:
“Nicole Daedone was at a Buddhist gathering when a monk made an unusual proposition: that he rub the upper left quadrant of her clitoris as part of a meditation ritual.”
“To figure out what the hell was going on, Daedone consulted a Buddhist teacher, who explained that she’d had an elevation in consciousness called a “kundalini opening” and taught her more about the practice of orgasmic meditation (known as “OM” for short) on the condition that she promote it.”
Additional documented lies regarding the origins of OM
- Daedone claims she was introduced to this practice by a Buddhist monk in her 2011 TEDx Talk.
- Daedone stated that a Buddhist monk introduced her to orgasmic meditation before she started OneTaste, though she did not name the monk nor the lineage the monk studied under.
- According to the story she repeats onstage and in YouTube videos, Daedone founded OneTaste in 2004 after she met a monk at a party who showed her a version of the technique she developed into OM.
- Orgasmic meditation was first introduced to Daedone by a Buddhist monk, and she began teaching the practice in 2001
- Orgasmic meditation is a practice that was adopted and made mainstream in 2004 by co-founder of OneTaste, Nicole Daedone. Daedone claims she was introduced to this practice by a Buddhist monk in her 2011 TEDx Talk.
- Hear co-founder Nicole Daedone’s story of how she encountered a Buddhist monk at a party who changed her life.
- Nicole states, “I met a monk at a party” – 10 seconds in on this video
What are the true origins of OM?
As Devi discusses in this episode, The Welcomed Consensus is an organization in Northern California that teaches a sexual practice called Deliberate Orgasm. Deliberate Orgasm and OM are nearly identical techniques. Deliberate Orgasm has no association with Buddhism. According to the leadership team at Welcomed Consensus, with whom Devi spent time in 2014-2015, Nicole Daedone met a student and resident of The Welcomed Consensus at a party in San Francisco. This person was NOT a Buddhist monk. In fact, the leadership team at The Welcomed Consensus told Devi that they don’t believe he was even a Buddhist.
This student of the Welcomed Consensus introduced Nicole Daedone to the technique called “Deliberate Orgasm” when they met one evening at a party. Nicole Daedone then went to live with The Welcomed Consensus for several years and trained in their methods, along with original One Taste Co-Founders, Robert Kandall and Ken Blackman. Nicole Daedone left The Welcomed Consensus organization (along with Robert Kandall and Ken Blackman) and rebranded “Deliberate Orgasm” as OM.
The “Buddhist Monk” origin story of OM was entirely fabricated to enhance the credibility and marketability of this method as a meditation technique. There is absolutely NO legitimate reason for Nicole Daedone to have misrepresented her introduction to this method so egregiously, except for the obvious intention to mislead and deceive the public about the true origins of this method.
- OneTaste Co-Founder Robert Kandell describes the TRUE Origins of OM
- 2014 Sex Is Medicine interview with The Welcomed Consensus describing Nicole Daedone’s introduction to Deliberate Orgasm.
Confronting the lie
What happened when the current OneTaste leadership was confronted with the lies surrounding the origins of OM?
Recently, on Facebook, Devi confronted the current OneTaste leadership with the evidence of Nicole’s Daedone lying about the origins of OM. During this process, the leadership of OT engaged in gaslighting, lies, and personal attacks against Devi.
These folks are trying to sell you “healing” while engaging in abusive behavioral tactics such as excusing and enabling lies, gaslighting to avoid accountability, DARVO, and smearing and defaming the people who provide evidence.
BOTTOM LINE:
Orgasmic Meditation (OM) has been marketed as a method for sexual healing, including supporting individuals in processing sexual trauma.
In the field of sexual wellness and trauma recovery, transparency is essential. Informed consent depends on truth. When individuals are not given accurate information—particularly about the origin, intent, or safety of a healing method—it can undermine their ability to give full and informed consent.
This is not a semantic issue—it’s about ethics and power dynamics. When companies misrepresent themselves or their methods, particularly in therapeutic or intimate contexts, it can constitute a breach of trust that feels psychologically exploitative to those impacted.
As consumers, we have the right to the truth, full disclosure, and to be fully informed about the origins of the methods and products we use. Particularly when these products are marketed to us as methods for “sexual healing” and when they purport to be methods for healing sexual trauma. Lying or misleading us about the origins of a practice or method we are engaging in robs us of our ability to consent.
The Conversation about Racism
Devi and others have spoken publicly about the racial bias that has allowed Nicole Daedone to blatantly and intentionally lie about the origins of this method for decades, as well as the utter lack of public accountability for these lies.
For example, if IATE founders and teachers had lied for the past two decades about the origins of the Tibetan 5 Element practices we teach, we would have been put out of business and/or sued for such blatantly fraudulent behavior.
Nicole Daedone not only lied about the origins of OM, but has also been CONVICTED of abuse, and yet she maintains a publicly supported platform and continues to be invited for public interviews and commentary on the topic of “Eros” – all while being indicted for, and later convicted of, predatory employment practices.
Along with the origin story of OM being completely false, the blatant racism of a North American white woman appropriating an Eastern spiritual tradition to lend unearned validity to it, in order to profit from it, can not, and should not be ignored.
This “Life Points with Ronda” Podcast episode explores the implicit racial bias embedded in the OneTaste trail, and which has also been instrumental in Nicole Daedone’s ability to LIE with impunity about the origins of OM for over 17 years.
Current and Recent Indictments and Discussion:
The documented behavior of OneTaste executives, as described in detail throughout the court reporting, is abhorrent.
The defendants express no remorse, no contrition, and in fact, the defense strategy is to double down on victim-blaming and shaming survivors for appropriate trauma responses.
Victim shaming/blaming is incredibly irresponsible, damaging, and should be disqualifying for a company promoting “sexual healing”.
- Court Reporter Nina Pullano
- https://www.courthousenews.com/boss-ordered-employees-to-have-sex-at-bay-area-startup-witnesses/
- https://www.courthousenews.com/womens-empowerment-branding-belied-focus-on-men-at-sex-cult-trial-witnesses-say/
- https://www.courthousenews.com/bay-area-sex-cult-workers-forced-to-service-wealthy-clients-sexually-witnesses/
- https://www.courthousenews.com/witness-testifies-to-mix-of-love-and-darkness-living-at-onetaste-sex-cult/
- https://www.courthousenews.com/witness-recounts-sex-abuse-public-humiliation-at-nyc-cult-branch/
- 2023 NEW lawsuit in Rolling Stones article
- Cults to Consciousness Podcast – please read the multiple comments under this video
- https://sf.gazetteer.co/an-early-taste-of-onetaste
- https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/05/13/how-the-founder-of-an-orgasmic-meditation-startup-on-trial/
- LOTS of good links here
After reviewing all of this, what are your thoughts?
Does knowing that Om was just a rebranded version of Deliberate Orgasm change your perception of it?
Would knowing that OM was simply an adaptation of another technique have affected your interest in or willingness to try it back in 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, etc?
And what do you think about the Founder of OM lying for over a decade about the origins of this method?
Let us know in the comments below.
2 Responses
How does it matter where the practice is coming from? And how come you’re so judgmental? This just doesn’t feel right. The practice is amazing and I love the way Nicole is teaching it. She’s putting her spin on it. Of course everything is already out there. I believe women doing transformational work should support each other, even when we make mistakes. You choose to attack. I wonder why… What are you getting out of this attacking, judgemental post? Can you seriously say with all your heart that you never made mistakes? That you’re always good and fully disclosing everything and always in the light?
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate the invitation to further clarify our position on this topic.
You are welcome to continue engaging in practices that align with your moral and ethical compass.
In our practice, we prioritize honesty, ethics, and transparency.
To that end, we remain committed to speaking out on issues that violate our values, regardless of the source.